My approach is structured and focused on the specific referral questions in a case. I evaluate whether clinical conclusions are supported by the record, identify key inconsistencies or gaps, and provide clear, well-reasoned opinions grounded in accepted professional standards.
My opinions are limited to areas in which I have direct clinical expertise, including psychotherapy, diagnosis, and clinical documentation. I do not provide opinions outside these areas (e.g., neuropsychological testing, police psychology, or criminal responsibility), ensuring that all analyses are well-grounded and defensible
Work typically begins with a brief discussion to clarify the referral questions, scope, and available records. This is followed by a focused review of the relevant psychological documentation. Findings are then provided through verbal consultation and, when appropriate, a written report or testimony.
I have been quoted in over 30 national media outlets for translating complex psychological concepts into clear, accessible language. This directly informs my consultation work, particularly when opinions must be understood by attorneys, judges, or juries without clinical training.
Available for consultation, record review, deposition, and testimony as appropriate. Attorneys are welcome to contact me directly to discuss case fit, scope, and availability. Responses are typically provided within one business day. Please do not include confidential or identifying information in initial outreach.